Accessibility report
Gothenburg university is responsible for this web site, and we want for as many as possible to be able to use it. This page describes how the web site lives up to the Swedish law on accessibility to digital public service. It also describes any known issues, and how you can report flaws to us, so we can solve them. We are constantly working to make sure that the web site fills the requirements set by law.
How accessible is the web site?
We are aware that parts of the website are not fully accessible. You can find out which parts are not fully accessible in the section Content that is not available.
What can you do, if you can't use parts of the web site?
If you need content from this website that is not available to you, but is excluded from the scope of the law as described below, please contact us.
Contact team Web and communication
Reporting flaws
We are constantly working to improve on the web site's accessibility. If you discover problems that aren't described on this page, of if you believe we do not fill the requirements set by law, then we ask you to tell us, so we can try to solve this issue.
Contact team Web and communication
Supervision
The Swedish Agency for Digital Government (DIGG) is responsible for the supervision of the law on access to digital public service. If you are not pleased with how we handle your thoughts, then you can contact DIGG and let them know.
Technical information about the web site's accessibility
This website is partially compliant with the Act on the Accessibility of Digital Public Services, due to the shortcomings described under the heading Content that is not accessible.
Content that is not accessible
Although the website is accessible to a hgh degree, it still has shortcomings that the University is working to address. The following content is not fully accessible:
- Parts of the content in the pages of the web site resides within so called landmarks, which haven't been named. This makes it difficult for users with screen readers to know their purpose.
- Headlines and heading levels aren't always used correctly, which can cause difficulties for users with cognitive or vision impairment.
- The search function does not fulfil accessibility requirements and does not work with keyboard navigation and screen readers. For example, the search function cannot be accessed via keyboard navigation when changing the filtering of results for news pages.
- The inbuilt screen reader is not fully responsive and doesn't change appearance for users browsing on phone, which makes it difficult to use.
- Some links lead to external web sites without notifying screen readers, using only visual icons to signal this.
- Some links lead to external web sites, but indicate that they lead to an internal page, using visual icons to signal this.
- Links to documents and external pages do not always describe where they lead to or that they are opened in a new browser window.
- In some places of the pages of the web site, a clearer focus on where you are, when navigating with a keyboard or voice control, is needed.
- In the main menu, and certain links, the difference between holding your mouse cursor over them and not, is too small. This is true for example for the menu link "Find News" and page internal menus for page content.
- A so called "Aria Label" is missing for the active link in the main menu, which prevents screen readers from telling what page in the main menu you are browsing.
- Text is commonly shown against a background image. This image also lacks text description.
- Text is sometimes shown against a background image which contains text or distracting graphical patterns.
- The web site uses italicization for long quotes, which can make the text unnecessarily difficult to read.
How we have tested the web site
We have done a self estimation (internal audit) of the web site using our own expertise. We have also, in the production of the web site, had external experts audit parts of it.
Method for audit
Expertise and a number of accessibility testing tools.
The last audit was done on February 27, 2025.
The accessibility report was last updated on February 27, 2025.